linux-kernel - Re: [v3 PATCH 3/3] powernv-cpufreq: Treat pstates as opaque 8-bit values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:13:29 +0530
From:   Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc:     "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        huntbag@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH 3/3] powernv-cpufreq: Treat pstates as opaque 8-bit
 values

Hi Balbir,

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:17:02PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy
[..snip..]
> >
> > -static inline int extract_pstate(u64 pmsr_val, unsigned int shift)
> > +static inline u8 extract_pstate(u64 pmsr_val, unsigned int shift)
> >  {
> > -       int ret = ((pmsr_val >> shift) & 0xFF);
> > -
> > -       if (!ret)
> > -               return ret;
> > -
> > -       return (pstate_sign_prefix | ret);
> > +       return ((pmsr_val >> shift) & 0xFF);
> >  }
> 
> So we just added this and moved from an int to u8. I was going to ask
> if we still need an int in patch1, but I thought the driver dealt with
> just integers because of the larger framework.

The larger framework is with respect to the device tree which defines
pstates as 32-bit integers (I am not aware of the reasons for this
choice, but perhaps device-tree doesn't have a s8/u8 type?!). The
driver still knows that pstates are only 8-bits wide because of the
PMSR,PMCR definitions. Before this patch, the driver was still doing
the conversions from 8-bit to int and vice-versa every time. With this
patch, we do it only once, i.e at the initialization. After that we
treat pstates as 8-bit integers. 


> 
> Balbir Singh.
>