[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r2rs76wr.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:54:28 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv: Fix unnecessary sleeping in hv_synic_alloc
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com> writes:
> The kzalloc function is called with GFP_ATOMIC.
> But according to driver call graph, it is not in atomic context,
> namely no spinlock is held nor in an interrupt handler.
>
> This GFP_ATOMIC is unnecessary, and replace with GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/hv/hv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> index 8267439..b0d025a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/hv.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ int hv_synic_alloc(void)
> int cpu;
>
> hv_context.hv_numa_map = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cpumask) * nr_node_ids,
> - GFP_ATOMIC);
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (hv_context.hv_numa_map == NULL) {
> pr_err("Unable to allocate NUMA map\n");
> goto err;
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
The subject line is not very accurate: GFP_KERNEL you switch too is the
one supporting 'sleep' when there's not enough memory, not
GFP_ATOMIC so you don't actually "Fix unnecessary sleeping". I'd suggest
you use something like "hyper-v: use GFP_KERNEL for hv_context.hv_numa_map"
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists