linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:33:48 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:02:08AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 09:52:50AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> > 
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > After merging the tty tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > failed like this:
> > >
> > > .config:4300:warning: symbol value '' invalid for SERIAL_SH_SCI_NR_UARTS
> > > *
> > > * Restart config...
> > > *
> > > *
> > > * Serial drivers
> > > *
> > > 8250/16550 and compatible serial support (SERIAL_8250) [M/y/?] m
> > >         .
> > >         .
> > >         .
> > > SuperH SCI(F) serial port support (SERIAL_SH_SCI) [M/n/y] m
> > >   Maximum number of SCI(F) serial ports (SERIAL_SH_SCI_NR_UARTS) [] (NEW) aborted!
> > >
> > > Console input/output is redirected. Run 'make oldconfig' to update configuration.
> > >
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > >   f6731485a519 ("tty: serial: sh-sci: Hide number of ports config question")
> > >
> > > I have used the tty tree from next-20171215 for today.
> > 
> > Sorry, silly misunderstanding of Kconfig behavior on my side.
> > Patch sent.
> 
> Really?  I don't see the patch anywhere, can you resend it please?

Got it now, thanks!

greg k-h