linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Allow a wakee to run on the prev_cpu if it is idle and cache-affine with the waker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171218105914.eodpk3ze6jxge3pu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:59:14 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sched: Allow a wakee to run on the prev_cpu if it is
 idle and cache-affine with the waker

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:56:46AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:26:10AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > Did you run these patches on more than just dbench? In specific I
> > suppose the schbench stuff from facebook would be interesting. Also that
> > NAS-lu benchmark.
> > 
> 
> A battery of tests including netperf streaming, netperf rr, sockperf,
> hackbench (various configs), pipetest, pgbench, siege, tbench, kernel
> building and some shellscript intensive workloads. schbench and NAS were
> not included but I'll do that before posting a new revision.


Much appreciated, Thanks!