[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171218144732.GA11237@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:47:32 -0600
From: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@...hat.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/xfs/040: document purpose
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:41:18PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Getting xfs/040 to "pass" takes a bit of effort, however the effort
> to require updating xfsprogs is purely an xfsprogs maintainer task
> only. There no functional gain by users of xfs or a QA team to get
> this test to pass. This is not trivial from the current description
> so document this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Looks good...
Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@...hat.com>
> ---
> tests/xfs/040 | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/040 b/tests/xfs/040
> index fadb888cbfaf..a0abc42f3720 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/040
> +++ b/tests/xfs/040
> @@ -3,6 +3,11 @@
> #
> # compare-libxfs test
> #
> +# The purpose of this test is only to nag the maintainer of xfsprogs to try to
> +# keep xfsprogs's libxfs files in sync with the latest kernel's libxfs. There
> +# is no functional need for anyone to actually run this test to confirm
> +# proper XFS functionalilty, this is an xfsprogs maintainer test.
> +#
> #-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> # Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> #
> --
> 2.15.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists