[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171218033408.whh7bkqfuaolrldm@treble>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:34:08 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stack traces and zombie tasks
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 07:51:45AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > commit 1959a60182f4 ("x86/dumpstack: Pin the target stack when dumping
> > it") slightly changed the behaviour of stack traces dumping for zombie
> > tasks.
> >
> > Before the commit (well, this is older SLE12 kernel, but that should not
> > matter), if one called 'cat /proc/<zombie pid>/stack', they would get
> > something like this
> >
> > [<ffffffff8105b877>] do_exit+0x6f7/0xa80
> > [<ffffffff8105bc79>] do_group_exit+0x39/0xa0
> > [<ffffffff8105bcf0>] __wake_up_parent+0x0/0x30
> > [<ffffffff8152dd09>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > [<00007fd128f9c4f9>] 0x7fd128f9c4f9
> > [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> >
> > After, one gets nothing. The trace is empty. try_get_task_stack() contains
> > atomic_inc_not_zero() (CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is now default on
> > x86_64) and because stack_refcount is 0 for a zombie task, it returns
> > NULL. Therefore, all save_stack_trace_*() functions return immediately.
> >
> > I guess that no one has cared about it so far. There is a problem for
> > live patching though. save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() returns -EINVAL for
> > the zombie task and its stack is deemed unreliable. It could block our
> > transition for quite a long time.
> >
> > We can skip those tasks in kernel/livepatch/ with a simple test we have in
> > kGraft. Skip the task if (task->state == TASK_DEAD && task->on_cpu == 0).
> > But you may want to change it generally, so better to ask first.
> >
>
> Sounds like a bug in save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() to me: if the
> task has no stack, then the trace is 100% definitely empty :)
I would agree with that, something like the following should fix it?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 77835bc021c7..20161ef53537 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -164,8 +164,12 @@ int save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(struct task_struct *tsk,
{
int ret;
+ /*
+ * If the task doesn't have a stack (e.g., a zombie), the stack is
+ * "reliably" empty.
+ */
if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk))
- return -EINVAL;
+ return 0;
ret = __save_stack_trace_reliable(trace, tsk);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists