[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171219214849.GU21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 21:48:49 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
syzbot
<bot+719398b443fd30155f92f2a888e749026c62b427@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>, keun-o.park@...kmatter.ae,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: BUG: bad usercopy in memdup_user
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 01:36:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I suspect that an "offset and size within the kernel object" value
> might make sense. But what does the _pointer_ tell you?
Well, for example seeing a 0xfffffffffffffff4 where a pointer to object
must have been is a pretty strong hint to start looking for a way for
that ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) having ended up there... Something like
0x6e69622f7273752f is almost certainly a misplaced "/usr/bin", i.e. a
pathname overwriting whatever it ends up in, etc. And yes, I have run
into both of those in real life.
Debugging the situation when crap value has ended up in place of a
pointer is certainly a case where you do want to see what exactly has
ended up in there...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists