[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f03d0baa-6a4a-0b67-056b-f2d0acb7befe@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:09:45 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
syzbot
<bot+719398b443fd30155f92f2a888e749026c62b427@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>, keun-o.park@...kmatter.ae,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: BUG: bad usercopy in memdup_user
On 12/19/2017 01:48 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 01:36:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> I suspect that an "offset and size within the kernel object" value
>> might make sense. But what does the _pointer_ tell you?
>
> Well, for example seeing a 0xfffffffffffffff4 where a pointer to object
> must have been is a pretty strong hint to start looking for a way for
> that ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) having ended up there... Something like
> 0x6e69622f7273752f is almost certainly a misplaced "/usr/bin", i.e. a
possibly poison values also?
> pathname overwriting whatever it ends up in, etc. And yes, I have run
> into both of those in real life.
>
> Debugging the situation when crap value has ended up in place of a
> pointer is certainly a case where you do want to see what exactly has
> ended up in there...
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists