[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171219045846.GE17164@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:58:46 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv6 00/12] printk: introduce printing kernel thread
On (12/18/17 22:38), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:46:10 +0900
> Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > anyway,
> > before you guys push the patch to printk.git, can we wait for Tejun to
> > run his tests against it?
>
> I've been asking for that since day one ;-)
ok
so you are not convinced that my scenarios real/matter; I'm not
convinced that I have stable and functional boards with this patch ;)
seems that we are coming to a dead end.
for the record,
I'm not going to block the patch if you want it to be merged.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists