linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] media: videobuf2: Add new uAPI for DVB streaming I/O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOFm3uHvVH4YDKkXtaBmRSotsB0SCzhjWz+8K9xA+BOa0xVRiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:49:05 +0100
From:   Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To:     Satendra Singh Thakur <satendra.t@...sung.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, madhur.verma@...sung.com,
        hemanshu.s@...sung.com, sst2005@...il.com,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Junghak Sung <jh1009.sung@...sung.com>,
        Geunyoung Kim <nenggun.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] media: videobuf2: Add new uAPI for DVB streaming I/O

Dear Satendra,

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Satendra Singh Thakur
<satendra.t@...sung.com> wrote:

<snip>

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-core/dvb_vb2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,422 @@
> +/*
> + * dvb-vb2.c - dvb-vb2
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Samsung Electronics
> + *
> + * Author: jh1009.sung@...sung.com
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation.
> + */

Would you mind using the new SPDX tags documented in Thomas patch set
[1] rather than this fine but longer legalese?

And if you could spread the word to others in your team this would be very nice.
See also this fine article posted by Mauro on the Samsung Open Source
Group Blog [2]
Thank you!

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/4/934
[2] https://blogs.s-osg.org/linux-kernel-license-practices-revisited-spdx/
-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne