linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] i2c: core: add device-managed version of i2c_new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfFXKnQUiJS0j+RodXzXRDreAnWZqvOUK945fe8pkVHsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:22:48 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] i2c: core: add device-managed version of i2c_new_dummy

2017-12-18 21:30 GMT+01:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>:
>
>> @Wolfram: if you're ok with these changes, I think they should go
>> through my tree. Let me know if you agree.
>
> Frankly, adding 115 lines to i2c-core should go through my tree, I
> think. Still need to look at the latest revision, though.
>

Indeed, but in this case, if you pick up the whole series, you'll run
into a conflict with patch 3/3 since at24 in my tree diverged so much
from mainline.

Thanks,
Bartosz