Message-ID: <CACT4Y+a75BJjWqsKhdHsJ5-h0YMdjD6_uXMLfdL5FxYp-3eFNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:49:44 +0100
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     syzbot 
        <bot+5e56fb40e0f2bc3f20402f782f0b3913cb959acc@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>, keun-o.park@...kmatter.ae,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: BUG: bad usercopy in old_dev_ioctl

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 11:47 PM, syzbot
> <bot+5e56fb40e0f2bc3f20402f782f0b3913cb959acc@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzkaller hit the following crash on
>> 6084b576dca2e898f5c101baef151f7bfdbb606d
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/master
>> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
>> .config is attached
>> Raw console output is attached.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this bug yet.
>>
>>
>> device gre0 entered promiscuous mode
>> usercopy: kernel memory exposure attempt detected from 00000000a6830059
>> (kmalloc-1024) (1024 bytes)
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:84!
>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> Dumping ftrace buffer:
>>    (ftrace buffer empty)
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 1 PID: 28799 Comm: syz-executor4 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc3-next-20171214+
>> #67
>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
>> Google 01/01/2011
>> RIP: 0010:report_usercopy mm/usercopy.c:76 [inline]
>> RIP: 0010:__check_object_size+0x1e2/0x250 mm/usercopy.c:276
>> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000116fc50 EFLAGS: 00010286
>> RAX: 0000000000000063 RBX: ffffffff82e6518f RCX: ffffffff8123dede
>> RDX: 0000000000004c58 RSI: ffffc900050ed000 RDI: ffff88021fd136f8
>> RBP: ffffc9000116fc88 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880216bb6050
>> R13: 0000000000000400 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffffffff82eda864
>> FS:  00007f61a06bc700(0000) GS:ffff88021fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> CR2: 0000000020a5afd8 CR3: 000000020f8a9000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
>> Call Trace:
>>  check_object_size include/linux/thread_info.h:112 [inline]
>>  check_copy_size include/linux/thread_info.h:143 [inline]
>>  copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:154 [inline]
>>  old_dev_ioctl.isra.1+0x21d/0x9a0 net/bridge/br_ioctl.c:178
>
> Uhh, this doesn't make sense, much like the other report...
>
>                 indices = kcalloc(num, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
>                 if (indices == NULL)
>                         return -ENOMEM;
>
>                 get_port_ifindices(br, indices, num);
>                 if (copy_to_user((void __user *)args[1], indices,
> num*sizeof(int)))
>
> offset is 0. size overlaps. usercopy checks in -next must be broken. I
> will double-check.


Start of heap object ending at 0x59 looks bogus, right?


>>  br_dev_ioctl+0x3f/0xa0 net/bridge/br_ioctl.c:392
>>  dev_ifsioc+0x175/0x520 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:354
>>  dev_ioctl+0x548/0x7a0 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:589
>>  sock_ioctl+0x150/0x320 net/socket.c:998
>>  vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
>>  do_vfs_ioctl+0xaf/0x840 fs/ioctl.c:686
>>  SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:701 [inline]
>>  SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:692
>>  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0x96
>> RIP: 0033:0x452a39
>> RSP: 002b:00007f61a06bbc58 EFLAGS: 00000212 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f61a06bc700 RCX: 0000000000452a39
>> RDX: 0000000020a59fd8 RSI: 00000000000089f0 RDI: 0000000000000014
>> RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000212 R12: 0000000000000000
>> R13: 0000000000a6f7ff R14: 00007f61a06bc9c0 R15: 0000000000000000
>> Code: 7b e5 82 48 0f 44 da e8 8d 82 eb ff 48 8b 45 d0 4d 89 e9 4c 89 e1 4c
>> 89 fa 48 89 de 48 c7 c7 a8 51 e6 82 49 89 c0 e8 76 b7 e3 ff <0f> 0b 48 c7 c0
>> 43 51 e6 82 eb a1 48 c7 c0 53 51 e6 82 eb 98 48
>> RIP: report_usercopy mm/usercopy.c:76 [inline] RSP: ffffc9000116fc50
>> RIP: __check_object_size+0x1e2/0x250 mm/usercopy.c:276 RSP: ffffc9000116fc50
>> ---[ end trace 5fadb883cda020dc ]---
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>> Dumping ftrace buffer:
>>    (ftrace buffer empty)
>> Kernel Offset: disabled
>> Rebooting in 86400 seconds..
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
>> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
>> Direct all questions to syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>> Please credit me with: Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
>>
>> syzbot will keep track of this bug report.
>> Once a fix for this bug is merged into any tree, reply to this email with:
>> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
>> To mark this as a duplicate of another syzbot report, please reply with:
>> #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
>> If it's a one-off invalid bug report, please reply with:
>> #syz invalid
>> Note: if the crash happens again, it will cause creation of a new bug
>> report.
>> Note: all commands must start from beginning of the line in the email body.
>
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/CAGXu5jLAvE9GaF%3DVdzR%3DwrUpquDSJkUXCidZMU-qb02%2BFDZW6g%40mail.gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists