[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6541e56d-a5d8-641e-99e8-cbc7bce6da3a@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:42:20 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
ivan.d.cuevas.escareno@...el.com, karthik.kumar@...el.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Olif Chapman <olif.chapman@...cle.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/mm: add a function to check if a pfn is UC/UC-
On 19/12/2017 03:40, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
>> As discussed in the reply to v2, this should include WC too. The
>> function name could become something like pat_pfn_downgraded_by_uc_mtrr.
>
> Or shall we just expose lookup_memtype(), and keep all other logic in
> KVM? The function name still looks strange somehow, and the check of
> memory type makes more sense and would be easier to understand in the
> context of KVM.
I agree that it's a bit strange, but I don't want to go against the
suggestions of the x86 maintainer.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists