linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] media: i2c: Add TDA1997x HDMI receiver driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOFm3uGB13QHDHOyS7MNfhBa+=HPWyVDtboHhw2R3K0PTLHaJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:49:06 +0100
From:   Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
To:     Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
Cc:     Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Hans Verkuil <hansverk@...co.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] media: i2c: Add TDA1997x HDMI receiver driver

Tim,

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> wrote:
> On 16/12/17 19:00, Tim Harvey wrote:
>> Add support for the TDA1997x HDMI receivers.
>>
>> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>

<snip>

>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/tda1997x.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,3520 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Gateworks Corporation
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>> + */

Would you mind using the new SPDX tags documented in Thomas patch set
[1] rather than this fine but longer legalese?  Thank you!

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/4/934

--
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne