[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171219125624.58e3e8f8@bbrezillon>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:56:24 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@...hiba.co.jp>
Cc: richard@....at, dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
marek.vasut@...il.com, cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] mtd: nand: toshiba: Retrieve ECC
requirements from extended ID
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:42:36 +0900
KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@...hiba.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2017/12/07 0:08, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 23:04:57 +0900
> > KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@...hiba.co.jp> wrote:
> >
> >> This patch enables support to read the ECC strength and size from the
> >> NAND flash using Toshiba Memory SLC NAND extended-ID. This patch is
> >> based on the information of the 6th ID byte of the Toshiba Memory SLC
> >> NAND.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: KOBAYASHI Yoshitake <yoshitake.kobayashi@...hiba.co.jp>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_toshiba.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_toshiba.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_toshiba.c
> >> index 57df857..c2c141b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_toshiba.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_toshiba.c
> >> @@ -35,6 +35,34 @@ static void toshiba_nand_decode_id(struct nand_chip *chip)
> >> (chip->id.data[5] & 0x7) == 0x6 /* 24nm */ &&
> >> !(chip->id.data[4] & 0x80) /* !BENAND */)
> >> mtd->oobsize = 32 * mtd->writesize >> 9;
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * Extract ECC requirements from 6th id byte.
> >> + * For Toshiba SLC, ecc requrements are as follows:
> >> + * - 43nm: 1 bit ECC for each 512Byte is required.
> >> + * - 32nm: 4 bit ECC for each 512Byte is required.
> >> + * - 24nm: 8 bit ECC for each 512Byte is required.
> >> + */
> >> + if (chip->id.len >= 6 && nand_is_slc(chip)) {
> >> + chip->ecc_step_ds = 512;
> >> + switch (chip->id.data[5] & 0x7) {
> >> + case 0x4:
> >> + chip->ecc_strength_ds = 1;
> >> + break;
> >> + case 0x5:
> >> + chip->ecc_strength_ds = 4;
> >> + break;
> >> + case 0x6:
> >> + chip->ecc_strength_ds = 8;
> >> + break;
> >> + default:
> >> + WARN(1, "Could not get ECC info");
> >> + chip->ecc_step_ds = 0;
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> + } else if (chip->id.len < 6 && nand_is_slc(chip)) {
> >> + WARN(1, "Could not get ECC info, 6th nand id byte does not exist.");
> >
> > I'm pretty sure you have old NAND chips that do not have 6bytes ids
> > (see the table here [1]), and printing a huge backtrace in this case is
> > probably not what you want.
> >
> > If you're okay with dropping this else block, I'll do the change when
> > applying, no need to send a new version.
>
> Some controllers may have limitation in reading ids beyond 5 bytes,
> considering such scenario we think it is better to keep this warning.
> However if you feel huge backtrace is an issue, how about we using pr_warn() instead?
>
Toshiba NANDs with an id smaller than 6 bytes exist, so no, we should
not complain at all. If the controller is broken and can't read the 8 id
bytes the core is asking for, then it should be detected at the core
level not in the NAND manufacturer driver.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists