lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171219012214.GA19673@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 20:22:14 -0500
From:   Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: proc_flush_task oops

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:50:52PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
 > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> wrote:
 > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:15:41PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
 > >  > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 04:44:38PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
 > >  > > I've hit this twice today. It's odd, because afaics, none of this code
 > >  > > has really changed in a long time.
 > >  >
 > >  > Which tree had that been?
 > >
 > > Linus, rc4.
 > 
 > Ok, so the original report was marked as spam for me for whatever
 > reason. I ended up re-analyzing the oops, but came to the same
 > conclusion you did: it's a NULL mnt pointer in proc_flush_task_mnt().
 > .. 
 > But I don't see what would have changed in this area recently.
 > 
 > Do you end up saving the seeds that cause crashes? Is this
 > reproducible? (Other than seeing it twoce, of course)

Hit it another two times in the last hour, so it's pretty reproducable.
Running it now with some more logging, will see if that yields any extra clues.

	Dave

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ