[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171219124908.GS2787@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:49:08 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: memcontrol: memory+swap accounting for cgroup-v2
On Mon 18-12-17 16:01:31, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> The memory controller in cgroup v1 provides the memory+swap (memsw)
> interface to account to the combined usage of memory and swap of the
> jobs. The memsw interface allows the users to limit or view the
> consistent memory usage of their jobs irrespectibe of the presense of
> swap on the system (consistent OOM and memory reclaim behavior). The
> memory+swap accounting makes the job easier for centralized systems
> doing resource usage monitoring, prediction or anomaly detection.
>
> In cgroup v2, the 'memsw' interface was dropped and a new 'swap'
> interface has been introduced which allows to limit the actual usage of
> swap by the job. For the systems where swap is a limited resource,
> 'swap' interface can be used to fairly distribute the swap resource
> between different jobs. There is no easy way to limit the swap usage
> using the 'memsw' interface.
>
> However for the systems where the swap is cheap and can be increased
> dynamically (like remote swap and swap on zram), the 'memsw' interface
> is much more appropriate as it makes swap transparent to the jobs and
> gives consistent memory usage history to centralized monitoring systems.
>
> This patch adds memsw interface to cgroup v2 memory controller behind a
> mount option 'memsw'. The memsw interface is mutually exclusive with
> the existing swap interface. When 'memsw' is enabled, reading or writing
> to 'swap' interface files will return -ENOTSUPP and vice versa. Enabling
> or disabling memsw through remounting cgroup v2, will only be effective
> if there are no decendants of the root cgroup.
>
> When memsw accounting is enabled then "memory.high" is comapred with
> memory+swap usage. So, when the allocating job's memsw usage hits its
> high mark, the job will be throttled by triggering memory reclaim.
>From a quick look, this looks like a mess. We have agreed to go with
the current scheme for some good reasons. There are cons/pros for both
approaches but I am not convinced we should convolute the user API for
the usecase you describe.
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists