linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Fix ethsys documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171219013222.GZ7997@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:32:22 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        sean.wang@...iatek.com, chen.zhong@...iatek.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Fix ethsys documentation

On 12/14, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> Hi Stephen, Michael,
> 
> On 12/01/2017 01:07 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > The ethsys registers a reset controller, so we need to specify a
> > reset cell. This patch fixes the documentation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt
> > index 7aa3fa167668..6cc7840ff37a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt
> > @@ -20,4 +20,5 @@ ethsys: clock-controller@...00000 {
> >  	compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-ethsys", "syscon";
> >  	reg = <0 0x1b000000 0 0x1000>;
> >  	#clock-cells = <1>;
> > +	#reset-cells = <1>;
> >  };
> > 
> 
> Will you take this patch through the clk tree, or shall I take it through my SoC
> tree?
> 

It's resets, we are clk maintainers. I'm clkfused.

You can take it, along with my

Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>

if you like/expect conflicts.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project