linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] DTS: GTA04: improve panel compatibility string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171219143733.GL3875@atomide.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Dec 2017 06:37:33 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Cc:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Benoît Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org, kernel@...a-handheld.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] DTS: GTA04: improve panel compatibility string

* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com> [171219 10:51]:
> On 11/12/17 17:22, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> [171201 07:44]:
> > > Official vendor string is now "tpo" and not "toppoly".
> > > 
> > > Requires patch "omapdrm: panel: fix compatible vendor string for td028ttec1"
> > > so that the driver understands both.
> > 
> > Tomi, so what's the plan with the dependency patch, is that for v4.16
> > or for the v4.15-rc cycle?
> 
> The dependency patch for this one is queued for v4.16 (I just sent a pull
> request today). I could pick this one up (if you give an ack) if I send
> another DRM pull request, but I probably don't have anything else to send so
> most likely I won't pick this up for v4.16.

OK thanks I'll queue both of these for v4.16 then.

> The patch 2/2 in the series doesn't have dependencies and can be applied as
> a fix for 4.15, or for 4.16.
> 
> Neither of these are critical, as things work fine without these patches.

OK thanks for confirming that.

Regards,

Tony