[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1513695919.7000.198.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:05:19 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] scripts/decodecode: Make it take multiline Code line
On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 12:51 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:03:23 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@
> linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > In case of running scripts/decodecode without any parameters in
> > order to give a
> > copy'n'pasted Code line from, for example, email it would parse only
> > first line
> > of it, while in emails it's split to few.
> >
> > So, add a logic to join this split back if and only if the following
> > lines have
> > hex digits, or spaces, or '<', or '>' characters. It will be quite
> > unlikely to
> > have a broken input in well formed Oops or dmesg, thus a simple
> > regex is being
> > used.
>
> That's rather hard to understand. An example would help?
When you have a file out of oops the Code line looks like
Code: hh hh ... <hh> ... hh\n
When copy'n'paste from, for example, email where sender or some middle
MTA split it, the line looks like:
Code: hh hh ... hh\n
hh ... <hh> ... hh\n
hh hh ... hh\n
The Code line followed by another oops line usually contains characters
out of hex digit + space + < + > set. That's what second paragraph
describes.
Should I resend with information above included?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists