linux-kernel - Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171219102839.367fa92d@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:28:39 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v4.14-rt][report] arm: run: stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:04:18 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:

> > 
> > The above just seems wrong. local_irq_disable() should imply
> > local_bh_disable(), as it doesn't let softirqs run either.  
> 
> Where does local_irq_disable() imply this?

If it doesn't explicitly do so, it probably should. How can we have a
softirq execute when irqs are disabled?

-- Steve