[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712191002480.16727@nuc-kabylake>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:03:37 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sched/isolation: Residual 1Hz scheduler tick
offload
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Adding the boot parameter "isolcpus=nohz_offload" will now outsource
> these scheduler ticks to the global workqueue so that a housekeeping CPU
> handles that tick remotely.
The vmstat processing required per cpu area access. How does that work if
the code is running on a remote processor?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists