lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hyd64a23Y0z7E2Cmay7Df795D52ouoh4T=uvtNnyBn=pA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:32:17 +0100
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sched/isolation: Residual 1Hz scheduler tick offload

2017-12-19 17:03 UTC+01:00, Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
>> Adding the boot parameter "isolcpus=nohz_offload" will now outsource
>> these scheduler ticks to the global workqueue so that a housekeeping CPU
>> handles that tick remotely.
>
> The vmstat processing required per cpu area access. How does that work if
> the code is running on a remote processor?

It seems that current::sched_class::task_tick() is ok with this, as it
uses per runqueues or per task datas. And both are passed as
arguments.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ