[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3317dd1a-1a39-3295-eb90-538be296dff8@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:30:29 -0500
From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...cle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Show up to three levels for a deadlock scenario
On 2017-12-14 12:59 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38:52PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>> Currently, when lockdep detects a possible deadlock scenario that involves 3
>> or more levels, it just shows the chain, and a CPU sequence order of the
>> first and last part of the scenario, leaving out the middle level and this
>> can take a bit of effort to understand. By adding a third level, it becomes
>> easier to see where the deadlock is.
>
> So is anybody actually using this? This (together with the callchain for
> #0) is always the first thing of the lockdep output I throw away.
>
Yes :-). The other stuff is unreadable to people not you.
Dhaval
Powered by blists - more mailing lists