[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171219164950.io3jswz4llanu3eq@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:49:50 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sched/isolation: Residual 1Hz scheduler tick offload
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:38:39AM -0600, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> And the term RT has been heavily abused by marketing folks to mean any
> number of things so people can use RT to refer to variety of things. So
> please always clarify what you mean exactly.
Do not _ever_ listen to marketing... Also your argument is circular, you
cannot state clearly what is meant if every word means something else to
others.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists