lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:17:43 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
        Pavel Shilovskiy <pshilov@...rosoft.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
        "linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "samba-technical@...ts.samba.org" <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CIFS: SMBD: fix configurations with INFINIBAND=m

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>>       depends on CIFS && INFINIBAND
>> +     depends on CIFS=m || INFINIBAND=y
>
> How about we change them to
>
>         depends on CIFS=m && INFINIBAND || CIFS=y && INFINIBAND=y
>
> This makes it easy to read.

Yes, that seems fine. I would normally group them using () to avoid
any confusion with operator precedence, but your version is
also correct, so just pick the one you like best.

       Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists