[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4ef6c82-f3c1-1a07-9f0f-cd442130ef37@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:20:02 +0100
From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
<paul.burton@...tec.com>, <rabinv@...s.com>,
<matt.redfearn@...tec.com>, <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
<marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
<kumba@...too.org>
CC: <Sergey.Semin@...latforms.ru>, <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] MIPS memblock: Remove bootmem code and switch to NO_BOOTMEM
Hello Serge,
On 19/12/17 21:14, Serge Semin wrote:
> Almost a year ago I sent a patchset to the Linux MIPS community. The main target of the patchset
> was to get rid from the old bootmem allocator usage at the MIPS architecture. Additionally I had
> a problem with CMA usage on my MIPS machine due to some struct page-related issue. Moving to the
> memblock allocator fixed the problem and gave us benefits like smaller memory consumption,
> powerful memblock API to be used within the arch code.
[...]
> @alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com. Do you still possess the Octeon MIPS64 platform to test the patchset?
yes, I'd like to test such a serious change on Octeon2. Please include me in the distribution list.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Sverdlin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists