linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] add infrastructure for tagging functions as error injectable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <739c5f3c-1dfc-7966-7d76-62aa3fcba9c3@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 20 Dec 2017 11:09:11 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Cc:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, darrick.wong@...cle.com,
        Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] add infrastructure for tagging functions as error
 injectable

On 12/20/2017 08:13 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:14:17 -0800
> Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com> wrote:
[...]
>> Please make your suggestion as patches based on top of bpf-next.
> 
> bpf-next seems already pick this series. Would you mean I revert it and
> write new patch?

No, please submit as follow-ups instead, thanks Masami!