[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171220113834.2578-2-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:38:31 +0100
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, angeloruocco90@...il.com,
bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH IMPROVEMENT/BUGFIX 1/4] block, bfq: add missing rq_pos_tree update on rq removal
If two processes do I/O close to each other, then BFQ merges the
bfq_queues associated with these processes, to get a more sequential
I/O, and thus a higher throughput. In this respect, to detect whether
two processes are doing I/O close to each other, BFQ keeps a list of
the head-of-line I/O requests of all active bfq_queues. The list is
ordered by initial sectors, and implemented through a red-black tree
(rq_pos_tree).
Unfortunately, the update of the rq_pos_tree was incomplete, because
the tree was not updated on the removal of the head-of-line I/O
request of a bfq_queue, in case the queue did not remain empty. This
commit adds the missing update.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@...il.com>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index a9e06217e64d..c6f0b93a769c 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -1627,6 +1627,8 @@ static void bfq_remove_request(struct request_queue *q,
rb_erase(&bfqq->pos_node, bfqq->pos_root);
bfqq->pos_root = NULL;
}
+ } else {
+ bfq_pos_tree_add_move(bfqd, bfqq);
}
if (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_META)
--
2.15.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists