[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171220140306.egxub7sog4il2plm@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:03:06 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@....com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: force update of blocked load of idle cpus
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 06:01:56PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> @@ -8955,8 +8964,20 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(void)
> if (ilb_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> return;
>
> - if (test_and_set_bit(NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK, nohz_flags(ilb_cpu)))
> + if (test_and_set_bit(NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK, nohz_flags(ilb_cpu))) {
> + if (!only_update) {
> + /*
> + * There's a pending/ongoing nohz kick/balance. If it's
> + * just for stats, convert it to a proper load balance.
> + */
> + clear_bit(NOHZ_STATS_KICK, nohz_flags(ilb_cpu));
> + }
> return;
> + }
> +
> + if (only_update)
> + set_bit(NOHZ_STATS_KICK, nohz_flags(ilb_cpu));
> +
> /*
> * Use smp_send_reschedule() instead of resched_cpu().
> * This way we generate a sched IPI on the target cpu which
This looks racy.. if its not we don't need atomic ops, if it is but is
still fine it needs a comment.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists