[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171220155000.GD17890@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:50:00 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Olivier MOYSAN <olivier.moysan@...com>
Cc: "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>,
"tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kernel@...inux.com" <kernel@...inux.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@...com>,
"patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ASoC: select sysclk clock from mlck clock
provider in wm8994 driver
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:42:10PM +0000, Olivier MOYSAN wrote:
> As a generic machine, simple or audio graph cards are not able to manage
> codec clock muxing.
> If we exclude the management of muxing through codec controls,
> the remaining solution is to handle it fully through clock framework.
> The current patch only supports a limited range of muxing capabilities
> of the codec.
> To have a full management of the muxing, I think it is necessary to add
> a device tree node for each codec interface and to define an aif clock
> in these nodes.
> Then parent clock assignment of these aif clocks would allow to handle
> the muxing.
Controlling clocking through a clock API binding would be good, yes.
That'd solve a bunch of other problems with use of multi-purpose clocks
for audio as well.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists