lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:57:36 +0000
From:   Daniel Thompson <>
To:     Felix Brack <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for ORISE OTM3225A LCD SoC

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 05:35:24PM +0100, Felix Brack wrote:
> Just a gentle echo request ;-)
> Is there something completely wrong with this patch or am I just too
> impatient?
> regards Felix
> On 03.11.2017 14:09, Felix Brack wrote:
> > This patch adds a LCD driver supporting the OTM3225A LCD SoC
> > from ORISE Technology. This device can drive TFT LC panels having a
> > resolution of 240x320 pixels. After initializing the OTM3225A using
> > it's SPI interface it switches to use 16-bib RGB as external
> > display interface.

Was this a backlight driver? I've just noticed all the backlight
maintainers on Cc: but the subject doesn't make this obvious and even
with you quoting the patch header I still can't be entirely sure!

As a result I think its very likely the patch simply got overlooked
because it didn't look much like a backlight driver when filtering
e-mail. Patches that can't be easily categorized from the subject
line will often get overlooked.

So, asssuming this was a backlight driver, could you resend the patch
with an updated description and a subject line commenting:
[PATCH] backlight: otm3225a:


Powered by blists - more mailing lists