[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171220173814.GC22246@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:38:14 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates
On 20/12/17 16:30, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[...]
> @@ -327,12 +331,7 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
> if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) {
> j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
> j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
> - j_sg_cpu->util_cfs = 0;
> - if (j_sg_cpu->util_dl == 0)
> - continue;
> }
This goes away because with Brendan/Vincent fix we don't need the
workaround for stale CFS util contribution for idle CPUs anymore?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists