[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871sjp1cjz.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:25:52 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Gargi Sharma <gs051095@...il.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: proc_flush_task oops
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 07:54:24PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> > > *Scratches my head* I am not seeing anything obvious.
> >
> > Can you try this patch as you reproduce this issue?
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
> > index b13b624e2c49..df9e5d4d8f83 100644
> > --- a/kernel/pid.c
> > +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
> > goto out_unlock;
> > for ( ; upid >= pid->numbers; --upid) {
> > /* Make the PID visible to find_pid_ns. */
> > + WARN_ON(!upid->ns->proc_mnt);
> > idr_replace(&upid->ns->idr, pid, upid->nr);
> > upid->ns->pid_allocated++;
> > }
> >
> >
> > If the warning triggers it means the bug is in alloc_pid and somehow
> > something has gotten past the is_child_reaper check.
>
> You're onto something.
>
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 12020 at kernel/pid.c:213 alloc_pid+0x230/0x280
> CPU: 1 PID: 12020 Comm: trinity-c29 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc4-think+ #3
> RIP: 0010:alloc_pid+0x230/0x280
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90009977d48 EFLAGS: 00010046
> RAX: 0000000000000030 RBX: ffff8804fb431280 RCX: 8f5c28f5c28f5c29
> RDX: ffff88050a00de40 RSI: ffffffff82005218 RDI: ffff8804fc6aa9a8
> RBP: ffff8804fb431270 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
> R10: ffffc90009977cc0 R11: eab94e31da7171b7 R12: ffff8804fb431260
> R13: ffff8804fb431240 R14: ffffffff82005200 R15: ffff8804fb431268
> FS: 00007f49b9065700(0000) GS:ffff88050a000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007f49b906a000 CR3: 00000004f7446001 CR4: 00000000001606e0
> DR0: 00007f0b4c405000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
> Call Trace:
> copy_process.part.41+0x14fa/0x1e30
> _do_fork+0xe7/0x720
> ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6c/0x80
> ? syscall_trace_enter+0x2d7/0x340
> do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210
> entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
>
> followed immediately by...
>
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> CPU: 1 PID: 12020 Comm: trinity-c29 Tainted: G W 4.15.0-rc4-think+ #3
> RIP: 0010:proc_flush_task+0x8e/0x1b0
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90009977c40 EFLAGS: 00010286
> RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00000000fffffffb
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffc90009977c50 RDI: 0000000000000000
> RBP: ffffc90009977c63 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000002
> R10: ffffc90009977b70 R11: ffffc90009977c64 R12: 0000000000000004
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: ffff8804fb431240
> FS: 00007f49b9065700(0000) GS:ffff88050a000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000004f7446001 CR4: 00000000001606e0
> DR0: 00007f0b4c405000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
> Call Trace:
> ? release_task+0xaf/0x680
> release_task+0xd2/0x680
> ? wait_consider_task+0xb82/0xce0
> wait_consider_task+0xbe9/0xce0
> ? do_wait+0xe1/0x330
> do_wait+0x151/0x330
> kernel_wait4+0x8d/0x150
> ? task_stopped_code+0x50/0x50
> SYSC_wait4+0x95/0xa0
> ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6c/0x80
> ? syscall_trace_enter+0x2d7/0x340
> ? do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210
> do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210
> entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
I am not seeing where things go wrong, but that puts the recent pid bitmap, bit
hash to idr change in the suspect zone.
Can you try reverting that change:
e8cfbc245e24 ("pid: remove pidhash")
95846ecf9dac ("pid: replace pid bitmap implementation with IDR API")
While keeping the warning in place so we can see if this fixes the
allocation problem?
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists