[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171220190745.GA178979@google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 11:07:45 -0800
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Move all MTD related branches to a single
repo
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi MTD maintainers,
>
> As discussed a few weeks ago, this patch is moving all MTD related
> branches to the linux-mtd repo in an attempt to make things easier
> for maintainers (it's not unusal to push the next or fixes branch to
> the wrong repo) and developers (it's hard to know where the patch was
> applied, especially when the maintainer does not specify it in his
> reply, which I do a lot :)).
>
> Once I have gathered acks from all active maintainers, I'll apply this
Eh, I'm not sure I qualify as "active" these days, but anyway...
> patch to the mtd/next branch and ask Stephen to pull next branches from
> their new locations.
>
> In the meantime, we should try to keep both l2-mtd and linux-mtd synced
> (that means pushing the xxx/next branches on both l2-mtd and mtd-next).
Seems fine.
Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
(Oh, well you've already pushed it.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists