lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c675643-45ec-c57f-f1b2-afb25f3e947e@opengear.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:25:03 +1000
From:   Andrew Cooks <andrew.cooks@...ngear.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Nehal Shah <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>,
        Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
        Ken Xue <Ken.Xue@....com>,
        Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel@...edrich.de>,
        Sudheesh Mavila <sudheesh.mavila@....com>,
        platypus-sw <platypus-sw@...ngear.com>
Subject: pinctrl-amd: What hardware does it apply to?

Hi Linus

I'm working on gpio for an AMD Family 16h Model 30h system[1]. The SoC is the same as the GX412-TC used in the PC Engines APU2. 

There is an out-of-tree gpio driver (gpio-amd) for this SoC in the meta-amd yocto layer[2].
Another driver (gpio-sb8xx) was submitted for upstream inclusion, but was knocked back with the suggestion that pinctrl is the way forward[3].

I would much prefer to use a mainline driver for the system I'm working on, so I'm looking at the pinctrl-amd driver to see whether it applies to our SoC, or whether it could be extended, or used as starting point for a new driver.

The out-of-tree drivers apply to the GX412-TC SoC and uses PCI for probing:

gpio-amd registers a platform driver that applies to { PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_HUDSON2_SMBUS }
gpio-sb8xx applies to { PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_HUDSON2_SMBUS } and { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_SBX00_SMBUS }

These IDs make it easy to cross reference with the datasheet, and keeps the coupling between ACPI and the driver low. 
These drivers do not provide a mechanism for firmware (ACPI or DT) to specify which gpios are safe to use or how to use them.

In contrast, the pinctrl-amd driver only mentions the newer KERNCZ platform name and uses ACPI for probing without disclosing any Family or Model numbers.

pinctrl-amd applies to "AMD0030" and "AMDI0030"

The ACPI HID matching makes it difficult to determine what family and model the driver applies to, or rather, I have not been able to find such a mapping of HIDs to family and model numbers. It's also impossible to guess an ACPI _HID that may or may not exist for the Family 16h Model 30h platform and even if I allocate a new HID for our ACPI implementation, that HID has little hope of being accepted into the mainline driver.

I would like to extend the generically named, but very specifically implemented pinctrl-amd driver to also work on Family 16h, Model 30h (specifically the FT3b package), and I propose to use the PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_16H_M30H_NB_F3 symbol to probe for the device.

Does this seem like a sensible way forward?

Thanks!

Andrew

1. http://support.amd.com/TechDocs/52740_16h_Models_30h-3Fh_BKDG.pdf
2. http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-amd/tree/meta-steppeeagle/recipes-kernel/amd-gpio/files/gpio-amd.c
3. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/20/202

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ