[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1513838904.17567.177.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:48:24 +0800
From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
"Sean Wang" <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Add USB remote wakeup driver
On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 14:55 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 04:45:29PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > These patches introduce the SSUSB and SPM glue layer driver which is
> > used to support usb remote wakeup. Usually the glue layer is put into
> > a system controller, such as PERICFG module.
> > The old way to support usb wakeup is put into SSUSB controller drivers,
> > including xhci-mtk driver and mtu3 driver, but there are some problems:
> > 1. can't disdinguish the relation between glue layer and SSUSB IP
> > when SoCs supports multi SSUSB IPs;
> > 2. duplicated code for wakeup are put into both xhci-mtk and mtu3
> > drivers;
> > 3. the glue layer may vary on different SoCs with SSUSB IP, and will
> > make SSUSB controller drivers complicated;
> > In order to resolve these problems, it's useful to make the glue layer
> > transparent by extracting a seperated driver, meanwhile to reduce the
> > duplicated code and simplify SSUSB controller drivers.
>
> Both the driver and binding look overly complicated to me when it looks
> like you just have 2 versions of enable/disable functions which modify
> a single register. The complexity may be justified if this was a common
> binding and driver, but it is not.
>
> You already have a phandle to the system controller. Can't you add cells
> to it to handle any differences between instances? That and SoC specific
> compatible strings should be enough to handle differences.
Yes, adding cells will also work well, I'll try it, thanks a lot
>
> Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists