lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 Dec 2017 16:13:17 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <>
Cc:     Patrick Bellasi <>,,,
        Ingo Molnar <>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <>,
        Vincent Guittot <>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <>,
        Morten Rasmussen <>,
        Juri Lelli <>,
        Todd Kjos <>,
        Joel Fernandes <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates

On 21-12-17, 11:39, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The difference is that we apply the per-cpu boost on the per-cpu util
> value and _then_ find the overall maximum.
> Instead of finding the overall maximum and then apply the per-cpu boost
> to that.

Okay, so it is just about the right sequencing of these comparisons but the
outcome will still be same, i.e. max of the 3 util/max values. Thanks.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists