[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171221104205.7269-15-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:41:43 +0100
From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, keescook@...omium.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 14/36] hrtimer: Use accesor functions instead of direct access
__hrtimer_hres_active() is now available unconditionally. Replace the
direct access to hrtimer_cpu_base.hres_active.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index ccfe340511a0..0ed86146096a 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ hrtimer_force_reprogram(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, int skip_equal)
{
ktime_t expires_next;
- if (!cpu_base->hres_active)
+ if (!__hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base))
return;
expires_next = __hrtimer_get_next_event(cpu_base);
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ static void retrigger_next_event(void *arg)
{
struct hrtimer_cpu_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
- if (!base->hres_active)
+ if (!__hrtimer_hres_active(base))
return;
raw_spin_lock(&base->lock);
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists