linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 10/36] hrtimer: Switch for loop to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171221104205.7269-11-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:41:39 +0100
From:   Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, keescook@...omium.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/36] hrtimer: Switch for loop to _ffs() evaluation

Looping over all clock bases to find active bits is suboptimal if not all
bases are active.

Avoid this by converting it to a __ffs() evaluation. The functionallity is
outsourced into an own function and is called via a macro as suggested by
Peter Zijlstra.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
---
 kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index 0e000b58f0d3..43e4f6607f9d 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -448,6 +448,23 @@ static inline void debug_deactivate(struct hrtimer *timer)
 	trace_hrtimer_cancel(timer);
 }
 
+static struct hrtimer_clock_base *
+__next_base(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, unsigned int *active)
+{
+	unsigned int idx;
+
+	if (!*active)
+		return NULL;
+
+	idx = __ffs(*active);
+	*active &= ~(1U << idx);
+
+	return &cpu_base->clock_base[idx];
+}
+
+#define for_each_active_base(base, cpu_base, active)	\
+	while ((base = __next_base((cpu_base), &(active))))
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON) || defined(CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS)
 static inline void hrtimer_update_next_timer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
 					     struct hrtimer *timer)
@@ -459,18 +476,15 @@ static inline void hrtimer_update_next_timer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
 
 static ktime_t __hrtimer_get_next_event(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base)
 {
-	struct hrtimer_clock_base *base = cpu_base->clock_base;
+	struct hrtimer_clock_base *base;
 	unsigned int active = cpu_base->active_bases;
 	ktime_t expires, expires_next = KTIME_MAX;
 
 	hrtimer_update_next_timer(cpu_base, NULL);
-	for (; active; base++, active >>= 1) {
+	for_each_active_base(base, cpu_base, active) {
 		struct timerqueue_node *next;
 		struct hrtimer *timer;
 
-		if (!(active & 0x01))
-			continue;
-
 		next = timerqueue_getnext(&base->active);
 		timer = container_of(next, struct hrtimer, node);
 		expires = ktime_sub(hrtimer_get_expires(timer), base->offset);
@@ -1241,16 +1255,13 @@ static void __run_hrtimer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
 
 static void __hrtimer_run_queues(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, ktime_t now)
 {
-	struct hrtimer_clock_base *base = cpu_base->clock_base;
+	struct hrtimer_clock_base *base;
 	unsigned int active = cpu_base->active_bases;
 
-	for (; active; base++, active >>= 1) {
+	for_each_active_base(base, cpu_base, active) {
 		struct timerqueue_node *node;
 		ktime_t basenow;
 
-		if (!(active & 0x01))
-			continue;
-
 		basenow = ktime_add(now, base->offset);
 
 		while ((node = timerqueue_getnext(&base->active))) {
-- 
2.11.0