linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171221215542.6bfb63a7@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:55:42 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the tip tree

Hi Thomas,

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:25:18 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Commit
> > 
> >   44d5c715330c ("x86/mm: Create asm/invpcid.h")
> > 
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.  
> 
> Yes. That's from the PTI work in progress branch. It was high flux so we
> did not care much about those details and the patches went back and forth
> between various people. So if we would have done that by the book we'd have
> something like.
> 
> SOB: tglx
> SOB: peterz
> SOB: mingo
> SOB: tglx
> SOB: mingo
> SOB: tglx
> 
> We'll clean that up for the final version

Then it should not be in linux-next ...  linux-next is *not* a development tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell