[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171221110556.GO21971@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:05:56 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Remove FSF address
Em Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:59:19AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 03:28:45PM -0800, Laura Abbott escreveu:
> > Checkpatch in the kernel now complains about having the FSF address
> > in comments. Other tools such as rpmlint are now starting to do the
> > same thing. Remove the FSF address to reduce warnings on multiple tools.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > For context, I'm updating the packaging for perf in Fedora which
> > requires a code/output review. This got flagged during that review.
>
> Thanks for the patch, applied.
Ingo pointed out to me that for the files we copied from the kernel we
better wait for the kernel original files to be changed, when we'll
notice via tools/perf/check-headers.sh and update the copies. The intel
pt decoder still have this check done outside check-headers.sh, we need
to do it there, conceptually its the same issue tho.
I'll separate the patch that touches things that are tools/ only and
apply next week, when I get back from vacation time.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists