lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:35:27 +0100
From:   LABBE Corentin <clabbe@...libre.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] crypto: Prevent to register duplicate
 cra_driver_name

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 05:35:22PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 08:09:25PM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > Each crypto algorithm "cra_name" can have multiple implementation called
> > "cra_driver_name".
> > If two different implementation have the same cra_driver_name, nothing
> > can easily differentiate them.
> > Furthermore the mechanism for getting a crypto algorithm with its
> > implementation name (crypto_alg_match() in crypto/crypto_user.c) will
> > get only the first one found.
> > 
> > So this patch prevent the registration of two implementation with the
> > same cra_driver_name.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@...libre.com>
> 
> No this is intentional.  The idea is that you can hot-replace
> an implementation by registering a new version of it while the
> old one is still in use.  The new one will be used for all new
> allocations.
> 

But the new implementation is different from the first so should have a new name.
The only case I found is ctr-aes-ce, and both are different (use/dontuse simd) so qualifying for different name.

Anyway, any advice on how to populate properly /sys/crypto with unique name ?
I have two idea:
- A number which increment after each register
- cra_driver_name-priority

Or does I use /sys/crypto/cra_driver_name/priority ? (which need to use some usage count on cra_driver_name node)

Regards

Powered by blists - more mailing lists