[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdkF9tioOqDwWFKWCRU832BZPMD1GjK+BonDbhEH0CCnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:18:32 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Divagar Mohandass <divagar.mohandass@...el.com>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: at24: add a missing compatible
2017-12-21 15:08 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>> "atmel,spd" is reported by checkpatch as undocumented in the device
>> tree bindings. Add it to the list of supported compatible strings.
>
>> "atmel,24c00",
>> "atmel,24c01",
>> "atmel,24c02",
>> + "atmel,spd",
>> "atmel,24c04",
>> "atmel,24c08",
>> "atmel,24c16",
>
> Sounds alogical to me to make a split by this new record.
> Can you find better line to inject?
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
They are actually ordered by memory size. I want to keep it like this
in the driver and I prefer that the DT reflect it.
Thanks,
Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists