linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] scsi: ufs: introduce static sysfs entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq14lokhklo.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:37:39 -0500
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jaegeuk\@google.com" <jaegeuk@...gle.com>,
        "gregkh\@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] scsi: ufs: introduce static sysfs entries


>> For future patch series submissions, please include a cover letter
>> that explains the purpose of the patch series and please also
>> document the changes between the different versions of the patch
>> series in the cover letter.
>
> Yup, I'll be aware of it. Thank you for the advice.

These look good to me.

Greg: Jaegeuk didn't carry over your review tags (despite the pretty
modest tweaks). Can I add your Reviewed-by: to these two when I queue
them up?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering