[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171221170413.qca3vnif5f62rqsk@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:04:14 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] checkpatch.pl: Add SPDX license tag check
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:28:48PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 17:46 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
> > Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. To summarize, SPDX license tags
> > should be on the 1st line (or 2nd line in scripts) using the appropriate
> > comment style for the file type.
> >
> > Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
> > Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > Thomas, if you are inclined and Joe is happy with this, can you add this
> > on top of your series adding license-rules.rst.
> >
> > v4:
> > - Reference license-rules.rst
> > - Add comment style checks based on file types
> > - Check .rst files
> >
> > v3:
> > - Since we specify that the tag goes on the 1st or 2nd line, the logic
> > can be greatly simplified compared to v2 because we can just use the
> > line number. And now the check is improved too.
> >
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > @@ -2866,6 +2866,31 @@ sub process {
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +# check for using SPDX license tag at beginning of files
> > + if ($rawline =~ /^\+/ && !($realline == 1 && $rawline =~ /^[\s\+]#!/)) {
>
> This test will enter this block for every added line of the patch.
>
> Needs to be /^[ \+]/ and not [\t\+] and probably should just be ^\+
>
> I'd probably have something like
> my $checklicenseline = 1;
>
> at the start of sub process
>
> and use something
>
> if ($realline == $checklicenseline) {
> if ($realfile =~ /\.(?:sh|pl|py)/ && $rawline =~ /\[ \+]\s*\!\#/) {
> $checklicenseline = 2;
> } elsif (etc...) {
> }
> }
Okay, here's what I've ended up with:
if ($realline == $checklicenseline) {
if ($realfile =~ /\.(?:sh|pl|py)/ && $rawline =~ /\[ \+]\s*\!\#/) {
$checklicenseline = 2;
} elsif ($rawline =~ /^\+/) {
my $comment = "";
if ($realfile =~ /\.(h|s|S)$/) {
$comment = '/\*';
} elsif ($realfile =~ /\.(c|dts|dtsi)$/) {
$comment = '//';
} elsif ($realfile =~ /\.(sh|pl|py)$/) {
$comment = '#';
} elsif ($realfile =~ /\.rst$/) {
$comment = '\.\.';
}
if ($comment !~ /^$/ &&
$rawline !~ m@^\+$comment SPDX-License-Identifier: @) {
WARN("SPDX_LICENSE_TAG",
"Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in 1st (or 2nd for scripts) line\n" .
$herecurr);
}
}
}
>
> > + } elsif ($realfile =~ /\.rst$/) {
> > + $comment = '..';
>
> \.\.
>
> What about .txt, .json, .cocci, and .awk ?
What about them? They aren't documented in license-rules.rst and I'm
just implementing what's documented as you said I should on v3.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists