lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:00:44 -0500 From: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Gargi Sharma <gs051095@...il.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: proc_flush_task oops On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:38:12PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > with proc_mnt still set to NULL is a mystery to me. > > > > Is there any chance the idr code doesn't always return the lowest valid > > free number? So init gets assigned something other than 1? > > Well, this theory is easy to test (attached). I didn't hit this BUG, but I hit the same oops in proc_flush_task. Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists