linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the keystone tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171222100513.79b0d3c6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 22 Dec 2017 10:05:13 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the
 keystone tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 09:45:58 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   f15187dcdbcd ("ARM: config: sync multi-v7 config with keystone peripherals")
> 
> from the keystone tree and commit:
> 
>   453c63073185 ("ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable missing drivers for supported Exynos boards")
> 
> from the samsung-krzk tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> index 6f2343e259f7,833892568d31..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> @@@ -558,7 -583,8 +559,9 @@@ CONFIG_VIDEO_STI_DELTA=
>   CONFIG_VIDEO_RENESAS_JPU=m
>   CONFIG_VIDEO_RENESAS_VSP1=m
>   CONFIG_V4L_TEST_DRIVERS=y
>  +CONFIG_VIDEO_VIVID=m
> + CONFIG_CEC_PLATFORM_DRIVERS=y
> + CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_S5P_CEC=m
>   # CONFIG_MEDIA_SUBDRV_AUTOSELECT is not set
>   CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7180=m
>   CONFIG_VIDEO_ML86V7667=m
> @@@ -582,16 -613,12 +585,17 @@@ CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU=
>   CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_LVDS=y
>   CONFIG_DRM_SUN4I=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_TEGRA=y
>  +CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE=y
>   CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_LD9040=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_S6E8AA0=m
>  -CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE=y
>  +CONFIG_DRM_DUMB_VGA_DAC=m
>  +CONFIG_DRM_NXP_PTN3460=m
>  +CONFIG_DRM_PARADE_PS8622=m
>  +CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511=m
>  +CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511_AUDIO=y
> + CONFIG_DRM_SII9234=m
>   CONFIG_DRM_STI=m
>  -CONFIG_DRM_VC4=y
>  +CONFIG_DRM_VC4=m
>   CONFIG_FB_ARMCLCD=y
>   CONFIG_FB_EFI=y
>   CONFIG_FB_WM8505=y
> @@@ -626,9 -655,10 +630,10 @@@ CONFIG_SND_SOC_SAMSUNG=
>   CONFIG_SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM8994=m
>   CONFIG_SND_SOC_SMDK_WM8994_PCM=m
>   CONFIG_SND_SOC_SNOW=m
> + CONFIG_SND_SOC_ODROID=m
>   CONFIG_SND_SOC_SH4_FSI=m
>   CONFIG_SND_SOC_RCAR=m
>  -CONFIG_SND_SIMPLE_SCU_CARD=m
>  +CONFIG_SND_SOC_STI=m
>   CONFIG_SND_SUN4I_CODEC=m
>   CONFIG_SND_SOC_TEGRA=m
>   CONFIG_SND_SOC_TEGRA20_I2S=m

This is now a conflict between the arm-soc and keystone trees (I think).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell