[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1513910633.2743.79.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:43:53 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Rick Altherr <raltherr@...gle.com>,
Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] clk: aspeed: Register gated clocks
On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 13:36 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > No you can't sleep here. It needs to delay because this is inside
> > spinlock_irqsave.
>
> Additionally you really don't want to delay for 10ms with interrupts
> off :-(
>
> Sadly, it looks like the clk framework already calls you with spinlock
> irqsafe, which is a rather major suckage.
>
> Stephen, why is that so ? That pretty much makes it impossible to
> do sleeping things, which prevents things like i2c based clock
> controllers etc...
I noticed we do have a few i2c based clock drivers... how are they ever
supposed to work ? i2c bus controllers are allowed to sleep and the i2c
core takes mutexes...
> I think the clk framework needs to be overhauled to use sleeping
> mutexes instead. Doing clock enable/disable at interrupt time is
> a bad idea anyway.
>
>
> In the meantime, Joel, you have little choice but do an mdelay
> though that really sucks.
>
> > > + /* Take IP out of reset */
> > > + regmap_update_bits(gate->map, ASPEED_RESET_CTRL, rst, 0);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(gate->lock, flags);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists