[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171222085603.GB18475@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:56:03 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "lpc.li" <lpc.li@...wei.com>
Cc: balbi@...nel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lidongpo@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: usb: gadget: function: f_rndis:use dev_kfree_skb_irq instead of
dev_kfree_skb
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:44:48PM +0800, lpc.li wrote:
> We can't use kfree_skb in irq disable context, because spin_lock_irqsave
> make sure we are always in irq disable context, use dev_kfree_skb_irq
> instead of kfree_skb is better than dev_kfree_skb_any.
Ok, but your patch uses:
> - dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
the _any call, not _irq, did you test this?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists